In the prisoner of war pledge, if I am senior, I will take command. If not, I will obey the lawful orders of those appointed over me. What is the correct interpretation?

• A. Senior takes command; otherwise obey those appointed and back them up.
• B. Always surrender when asked.
• C. Always refuse all orders.
• D. Disobey orders to avoid harm.

Answer: (A)

The idea is to preserve order and a clear line of leadership among prisoners of war. The pledge assigns command to the most senior prisoner; if you aren’t the senior, you follow the lawful orders of those appointed over you and back them up. This keeps decisions coordinated, prevents competing factions, and supports safe, humane treatment by sticking to legitimate leaders. “Lawful orders” are commands given by someone officially in command and allowed under the laws of war; disobeying or mutiny would disrupt discipline and endanger everyone. The other interpretations would mischaracterize the role of rank and obedience in maintaining order under captivity.